Article
4 min

SDR: The UK enters the fray of sustainable finance regulation

With the imminent implementation of sustainability requirements in the UK, the set of regulatory rules is becoming increasingly complex. WeeFin helps you understand these new proposals and navigate between the European and Anglo-Saxon environments.
Written by
Noémie DOUBLIEZ
Published on
18/9/2023

The regulatory landscape around the sustainability of financial products is currently in a state of flux, and the UK is keen to stay in the race while avoiding the pitfalls currently faced by its European counterpart. Indeed, in 2021, the government set out its intention to make the UK the preferred place for sustainable investment, publishing its roadmap, Greening Finance. This intention will come to fruition this year with the arrival of new UK regulations.

Implementation imminent

While the European Commission is already reviewing its regulations on the sustainability of financial products, and on the other side of the Atlantic, the SEC has made a regulatory proposal, their Anglo-Saxon counterpart, the FCA, has formalized a proposal for sustainability requirements.

Almost a year ago, on October 25, 2022, the FCA published a regulatory proposal to combat greenwashing, known as the Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR). These measures include transparency requirements and the classification of investment products according to a system of labels.

The consultation, which opened at the end of 2022, closed on January 25, 2023, and the FCA announced that changes would be made to incorporate the extensive feedback (over 240 responses) received on the proposals. These modifications shift the final publication of the regulations to the end of Q3 2023 (originally planned for the end of the first half of 2023). The UK SDR is expected to come into force 12 months later, at the end of 2024.

A scope of application restricted to products managed in the UK

The regulation will apply to UK-based asset managers.

The current proposals will therefore not apply to foreign products marketed in the UK

However, the FCA plans to deal with the latter at a later date, with the launch of a dedicated consultation (no publication date known at present).

In addition, given the importance of cross-border activity between the EU and the US for the UK investment fund industry, the FCA is proposing equivalence routes with the SFDR and the SEC proposal (see mapping p. 83 of the FCA consultation, available here).

Demanding proposals to combat greenwashing

In developing its proposals, the FCA drew on established standards and recommendations from a number of international bodies, including the Climate Disclosure Task Force, IOSCO and ISSB IFRS.

The proposed measures include

1. A system for labelling products according to their level of sustainability: three exclusive labels have been proposed, each with a different objective and intention:
  • Sustainable Focus - Financial products bearing this label must invest a minimum of 70% in sustainable assets.
  • Sustainable Improvers - Financial products bearing this label are those that aim to have a positive or sustainable environmental impact in the future (improving their ESG performance over time). 
  • Sustainable Impact - Financial products bearing this label are those that focus on investments with measurable contributions to environmental or social issues. 

Please note that these labels are exclusive: a financial product cannot fit into more than one category!

For a product to be eligible for a label, it must first satisfy "transversal" criteria, then criteria specific to its label.

One of the highlights of the SDR proposal is the Improvers category. This is the first regulatory approach to include a specific category for "going green " and not just "being green". Responsible transition can now be a strategy in itself.

⚠ Potential problems :  

  • If a fund achieves good sustainability performance (through its focus and impact) but is also committed to improving the underlying performance of the assets in which it invests (through its voting, engagement strategy, ...), then it is unclear which label the fund should choose. The treatment of funds of funds that encompass multiple strategies also raises questions.
  • The UK SDR imposes strict criteria for qualifying financial products as sustainable, which could lead to a product being classified as sustainable with regard to SFDR but not under the UK SDR, potentially confusing the market.
2. Restrictions on naming and marketing

‍Theserules govern the use of sustainability-related terms in product names and marketing materials. For managers whose products do not have sustainability labels or features, restrictions apply with, for example, a ban on the use of terms such as "ESG", "green" and "sustainable" in customer literature. 

3. A reporting framework
  • Aimed at retail investors : this information would help consumers better understand the main sustainability-related features of a financial product. This information will be required even if the financial product does not carry a label.
  • Aimed at a broader range of investors (e.g. institutional or retail investors): all managers using a product label, and those not using a label but identifying sustainability features, will have to provide detailed pre-contractual information at product level (contained in the fund prospectus). Managers using a label for a product will also be required to publish ongoing information on sustainability performance.

For the moment, the FCA has no intention of providing templates for the various documents to be published, considering that this could be too restrictive and risk stifling innovation in this developing market. 

  • Entity level - Following in the footsteps of its French neighbor, which has imposed the publication of Article 29 LEC, the UK would also require managers with more than £5bn to publish a set of TCFD-aligned disclosures.

A significant gap between SFDR and SDR

Juggling regulatory classifications with the ESG Connect platform


ESG Connect's functionalities meet 100% of the FCA's proposals, while helping to limit the costs and risks associated with ESG processes. Our ESG Operating System enables:

  • access to a single ESG golden source
  • implement transparent and flexible ESG scoring models
  • facilitate collaboration between teams (ESG analysts, managers, controls, reporting)

Navigating between regulations is made easier, and future developments are anticipated for easy implementation.

Below is a link to a demo ofESG Connect

Monthly newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our latest publications.
Learn more about our privacy policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related resources

Article

Data, a real challenge for financial institutions

What are the major stages of ESG data processing that financial actors face?
Read the publication
Case Study

Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT): the perfect tool to master Transition disclosure

Download our study on the Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT).
Read the publication

Discover the benefits of ESG Connect

Subscribe to the newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our latest publications.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.